Product
PMS on Finvica.
Mandates tracked, provider statements reconciled into the client’s consolidated book, and fees computed on the structure that actually applies.
Scope
What is operationally supported.
| Product | Order capture | Routing | Corporate actions | Valuation basis | Reporting | Commission |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMS | Yes, with conditionsOffline order entry | Not supported | Not supported | Yes, with conditionsNon-unitised — statement value | Yes | Yes |
Valuation basis: Non-unitised — valued from the provider’s statement. There is no published NAV, so Finvica does not manufacture one.. Set per instrument rather than per product, and operator-settable.
- PMS provider statements
What PMS connects to
Workflow
Running PMS, step by step.
The mandate is recorded
Client, portfolio manager, strategy and initial corpus, on the client’s book.
The provider statement arrives
Positions and valuation are taken from the statement rather than estimated, which is what makes your client statement agree with the provider’s.
The consolidated view updates
The PMS position sits alongside mutual funds, AIF and everything else in one client view rather than in a separate login.
Fees and brokerage compute
On the fee structure that applies to the mandate, reconciled like every other revenue line.
Regulatory
Where this sits with the regulator.
SEBI portfolio management regulations. The portfolio manager runs the mandate; you distribute it under your own registration and Finvica records it.
Finvica is a technology platform. It does not hold an ARN, does not advise, and does not solicit investments. You transact under your own registration and remain the regulated party in your own client relationships.
Related modules
What touches PMS.
- Order managementEvery order, every product class, one basket.
- Holdings and valuationWhat every client owns, priced this morning.
- Reports and statementsStatements that go out on schedule, whether or not you remember.
- Revenue and commissionsComputed daily, reconciled against the AMC file, variances flagged.
Who this is for
If this is the class you are here about.
Distributors searching for PMS handling are usually asking a bigger question about their whole book. The solution page for that buyer covers the rest of it.
Questions about PMS.
How is a PMS position valued without a NAV?
From the provider’s statement. That is the correct basis for a non-unitised holding, and treating it that way is what makes the reconciliation balance rather than drift.
Which PMS providers are supported?
Named provider coverage follows the claim register (00 §11, open decision 1). Statement-based capture works regardless of provider.
Can clients see PMS alongside their other holdings?
Yes — that is the point. One statement, one set of numbers, across every class on the book.